Messages - vDiplomacy

Chat archive

07 Dec 16 UTC	Spring, 1999: (Pope Innocent XI): Hello there. Gunboat eh?
07 Dec 16 UTC	Spring, 1999: (DogsRule11): Yup.
08 Dec 16 UTC	Spring, 1999: (DogsRule11): We should advertise this.
13 Dec 16 UTC	Spring, 1999: (bugzduck): POLITICIS and its my return to diplomacy BEST OF LUCK TO YOU ALL
13 Dec 16 UTC	Spring, 1999: (bugzduck): not my return to spelling correctly however
20 Dec 16 UTC	Autumn, 1999: GameMaster: NMR from New-York. Send the country in CD.
20 Dec 16 UTC	Autumn, 1999: GameMaster: Missing orders for Autumn, 1999 (Diplomacy) from a country with 2 or more SCs. Extending phase.The game will continue after this phase even if you do not find a replacement.
20 Dec 16 UTC	Autumn, 1999: GameMaster: Someone has taken over New-York replacing "bugzduck". Reconsider your alliances.
11 Jan 17 UTC	Spring, 2002: GameMaster: Florida voted for a Concede. If everyone (but one) votes Concede the game will end and the player _not_ voting Conceede will get all the points. Everybody else will get a defeat.
11 Jan 17 UTC	Spring, 2002: GameMaster: Florida voted for a Cancel. If everyone votes Cancel all points will be refunded and the game will be deleted from the database.
20 Jan 17 UTC	Autumn, 2003: GameMaster: Someone has taken over Heartland replacing "smokeythebear2701". Reconsider your alliances.
22 Jan 17 UTC	Autumn, 2003: GameMaster: Heartland voted for a Draw. If everyone votes Draw the game will end and the points are split equally among all the surviving players, regardless of how many supply centers each player has.
26 Mar 17 UTC	Autumn, 2011: GameMaster: Someone has taken over Quebec replacing "Amwidkle". Reconsider your alliances.
03 May 17 UTC	Good game. I'm curious, though - Quebec, why stab? You could likely have pulled a draw if you held the line.
03 May 17 UTC	(also: end goal, get fleets into the Great Lakes: SUCCESS!)
03 May 17 UTC	Well, that schux.... But good game @peru - welcome to the club :). I had considered you from an early stage my main antagonist. Having been the first one to ever win with Peru on this map, i knew how annoying pinky can become in the hands of people who know what they are doing, and it seemed like you did. Hence, i had strategically not taken hawaii in order to hold the pacific line, even though i had to deal with an annoying californian army for a while (though there was absolutely no reason to have him as an additional survivor). @Texas: i think you should have earlier started to concentrate on the south instead on me. I needed someone to balance peru in the gulf, alas, all i saw from you were armies going towards me.. Pity. @Quebec..... W...T....F? dude, did you get bored with this game and decided to blow it? Seriously, you better should have stayed out. The previous quebec was rather unreliable, reacting with indignation when i moved towards him when he missed his moves, but at least he knew peru is the top priority. But you? i had pretty much deescalated our border and you had one simple job: make sure your border in the north is tight. I am sure i would have done my part in the south and stalemated the shit of of peru after a while. But all you did is sitting in those centers letting peru take one position after another around you bay (even though he could not get past my defenses). Maybe you should go play risk... right now you are just causing lots of facepalm migraine...
03 May 17 UTC	If Texas had retreated to San Antonio, bouncing the Mexican army and then rebuilding, I'd probably have gone for the 5-way draw as soon as we'd cleaned up Mexico, to be honest. I'd spent a while before then alliance-signalling, which seemed to be being repaid by the north-focused armies rather than contesting my fleets. BC, surprised you didn't collapse my Pacific line. All it would have taken was dislodging MPO (rather than bouncing Hawaii) one spring where I was occupied convoying, and you'd have 3 strength to bring to bear on Hawaii for autumn, proceeding to completely shut down my ability to make that critical Lima->Guatemala convoy.
03 May 17 UTC	I was expecting some annoyance, but the way I saw it was one of you had my home SCs the other didn't. At the time when I was thinking of the stab BC wasn't far behind so that's how I decided who to help
03 May 17 UTC	Also, I'm below 1000 points for a reason
03 May 17 UTC	yeah, and thats why you should play risk and not diplomacy.... seriously, a draw was a perfectly viable outcome. and i dont know how peru feels, but people usually prefer to win by overcoming all opposition and not by the actions of someone who apparently likes to play fucking santa instead of playing the game