Forum
A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.
Page 87 of 160
FirstPreviousNextLast
Gumers (1801 D)
15 May 13 UTC
Site slow
What is happening with this site? It´s very slow the last few days...
5 replies
Open
slytheringirl (994 D)
07 May 13 UTC
I'm new... :)
Hi there :) How do you join a game? Can you help? Thanks!
74 replies
Open
Dr. Recommended (1660 D Mod (B))
15 May 13 UTC
(+1)
The "Gunboat Has No Diplomacy" Thread
(Split out from the ranking thread)

18 replies
Open
Pimlico (1097 D)
13 May 13 UTC
abusive chat
What is the general rule on chat being offensive? How do we deal with it? I am involved in a game whee I have moved against a player expecting me to be his ally and he has come back with %** %**!!.
17 replies
Open
Captainmeme (1400 D Mod (B))
20 Apr 13 UTC
Ankara Crescent Variant
I figured I'd give a quick overview for those of you who are too lazy to read the variant description :D
26 replies
Open
daboyz78 (1139 D)
15 May 13 UTC
Knowing each other/cooperating in an anonymous game
I am playing a game where the parties are meant to be anonymous and there have been moves that take careful coordination by two of the parties against me. Is there any way to look into this?
7 replies
Open
drwiggles (1582 D)
10 May 13 UTC
SCs neded to win
This is not a reference to any specific game, but I find it incredibly annoying that people do not check the SCs to win and continue to fight each other while someone else conquers easily.
27 replies
Open
Jimbozig (1179 D)
14 May 13 UTC
RATING SCHEDULE
Sorry to complain again about this thing, but I still believe that the 1v1s should not be on the same ranking scheme as normal games.
17 replies
Open
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
14 May 13 UTC
(+1)
So inspiring...
I'm the last one for sure to view this vid from Commander Chris Hadfield, but if someone else really missed this gem on youtube check out this link:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=KaOC9danxNo
2 replies
Open
SandgooseXXI (1294 D)
13 May 13 UTC
(+11)
I'm a married man!
Just a couple photos because I didn't take any, I stole a couple off Instagram and Facebook but I don't mind sharing a few photos from my special day! This week we fly to Spain!!! Friday!!! Anyways, if someone wouldn't mind sharing on webdip that'd be great!
15 replies
Open
Decima Legio (1987 D)
08 May 13 UTC
Take over from Civil Disorder thread
I wonder if the system can be put in condition to append an automatic message each time a country goes in Civil Disorder, displaying gameID, country, previous player (questionable).
That would shorten the distance between supply and demand and would help filling open positions in time…at least the playable ones.
10 replies
Open
red-claw-blue (1087 D)
12 May 13 UTC
A Kind (And Brave) Soul Needed
Need someone to fill in as Austria, gameID=14112
c'mon guys, do it for poor Balkan...
1 reply
Open
Spartan22 (1883 D (B))
10 May 13 UTC
Phantom Variant Idea
I thought of this idea the other day that I was thinking could make an interesting variant if it is actually possible. Part of this idea is based off the idea of having units with different strengths like in the Pirates variant. More information below:
21 replies
Open
DoubleCapitals (736 D)
12 May 13 UTC
Temporary sitter required for a WWIV games

3 replies
Open
Jonnikhan (1554 D)
11 May 13 UTC
gameID=12532: Glitch Alert for Oli!
BIO can't move to SNT, VAL or MDZ, but can support all three. Also PIT can't convoy to VAL, ATA, or ARQ (I had a fleet in CHB for that purpose). I believe the game has a major glitch. Am I right, or was it the loaner computer I was using being dysfunctional (a distinct possibility)?
1 reply
Open
Jonnikhan (1554 D)
10 May 13 UTC
Major glitch in WWIV game.
I'm Oceania. BIO will not move to MDZ, SNT or VAL, yet it can support all three. Also, my army in PIT can not or will not convoy to ARQ, ATA or VAL. As Oceania all my best laid plans are now FUBAR.
1 reply
Open
SandgooseXXI (1294 D)
10 May 13 UTC
Humor is good for the soul
In the need for a quick little laugh? This thread should be able to brighten up your day! Post funny videos and pictures here:

Ill go first: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBftA7V4xak
5 replies
Open
Amwidkle (1351 D)
08 May 13 UTC
Copyright infringement?
Does the Haven variant infringe copyrights?
19 replies
Open
yaaks (1157 D)
09 May 13 UTC
Oli
Oli, you put in a lot of time into moderating the site.
Why don't you ever play any games?
6 replies
Open
General Cool (978 D)
08 May 13 UTC
Question
If you try to cut a support hold by convoying a unit, and the convoy fails... Will you still cut support?
6 replies
Open
Mapu (2086 D (B))
30 Apr 13 UTC
(+7)
New Feature Request: Mark as Unread
So many times I'll be on my phone and will click an envelope to read the game message, but it will require an involved answer and I'll sometimes forget to reply because I forget about the message. What about a way to click something to make the envelope stay on that country's tab? Kind of like marking something as unread in Gmail.

Thanks!
Alphonse_Z (915 D)
30 Apr 13 UTC
I like this idea, this has happened to me several times as well.
Spartan22 (1883 D (B))
30 Apr 13 UTC
I agree, this is a great idea. Maybe have a button next to the "reply" button that can be "Mark as Read." That way, even if you're on a computer and are too lazy to reply to it, you can leave it as unread.
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
30 Apr 13 UTC
Interesting idea.
IMHO a "Mark unread" would be better as a "Mark read", as most of the time you can answer right away...
Spartan22 (1883 D (B))
30 Apr 13 UTC
Maybe you could implement a button for "Mark as read" if you want the message icon to disappear, or if you respond to the message, it automatically marks it as read.
RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 D)
30 Apr 13 UTC
Excellent idea, Mapu! For whatever reason Oli, I seldom respond right away (and that's probably a good thing for me!). I tend to read players' diplomacy, study the map, and study their message, and consider my response as well as my actions. If it's a back and forth (real time) dialogue, then the responses are quick like a chat box. But when they are day to day or overnight responses, they tend to be more complex, and I take my time composing messages. Either way would be a big help, but the 'mark as unread' seems most intuitive to me because that's how I mange my email in box.
Retillion (2304 D (B))
30 Apr 13 UTC
Thank you Mapu for this excellent idea +1 :)

And yes, I agree with Oli : a "Mark unread" would be better than a "Mark read".
GOD (1830 D Mod (B))
30 Apr 13 UTC
meh...i wouldnt have to use a "unread" utgon all the time (though the idea is great), but i would rather have to press "read" which could be quite annoying...
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
01 May 13 UTC
Should I put text on this button ("Mark unread" - big) or should I put the envelope (with a mouse-over explanation - small) on the page?
Regarding usability, where should I put this button?
Yes, excellent idea! I really appreciate how quickly good ideas can be accepted and implemented here. Thanks for the suggestion, Mapu, and thanks to Oli for jumping right on it.

As for the button, maybe just below the 'Send' button beside the message window?
Spartan22 (1883 D (B))
01 May 13 UTC
Yeah, I agree with Dr. R, if you put it below the Send button (or above) it would be in a convenient place. I think also having text on the button is clearer than having to mouse over the button for an explanation.
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
01 May 13 UTC
Tried different solutions, so far I dislike all.
A text-button is really big and ugly. And If I change this to the envelope-icon it's hard to see what this button should do. (Esp. if placed right after the "send" button.
Maybe someone can come up with better ideas...
Spartan22 (1883 D (B))
01 May 13 UTC
Is there anyway to put the button inside the text window where the time is? Maybe along with a column for the time each message was sent, there could be a column with a check box or a button at the bottom that would let you mark the message as read.... Not too sure how to aesthetically implement the button.
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
01 May 13 UTC
Once someone views the message the "newMessage"-flag is cleared, so I can't check whether this is actually a new message or not, because by viewing the messages they are already no longer new.
I can just put a button somewhere on the page, but I can't check if you view a new message and what lines of text are new and toggle the visibility of the button accordingly.
Spartan22 (1883 D (B))
01 May 13 UTC
Is there anyway to revert back to the previous loading of the page where the new message flag isn't cleared?
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
01 May 13 UTC
No.
I can just choose to clear the 'new-meaage-flag' later (or not at all).
But I would like to implement a solution that does not mess that much with the code...
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
01 May 13 UTC
If the envelope-icon doesn't work, what about an 'envelope with line through it'-icon..
or what about a text link 'Mark Unread' instead of a text button?
butterhead (1272 D)
01 May 13 UTC
Or for a text button instead of putting "Mark as Unread" just put "Unread"... makes it a lot smaller I would think.
steephie22 (933 D)
01 May 13 UTC
or make an options button, the word or a tool or something, somewhere near the message box and have "Mark as Unread" and "Mark as Read" as options, and, while you're at it, you might as well add another mark, like a star or something. That won't look too ugly right?

Great idea btw.
jmo1121109 (1200 D Mod)
01 May 13 UTC
Could you insert something like "turn message alert back on" at the top of the messages column? The icon only goes away when you read the actual pm in the message column so putting the option there means everyone would see it when they click on the envelope.
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
01 May 13 UTC
(+2)
Not sure about the positioning of the button, but it's a working prototype.
Mapu (2086 D (B))
01 May 13 UTC
OMG that is hot shit. So awesome. Thanks!
SandgooseXXI (1294 D)
01 May 13 UTC
This button...(and pardon my french)

KICKS ASS!!!!
RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 D)
01 May 13 UTC
Echoing others comments. I love this feature. Thanks to Mapu for suggesting and to our illustrious host for implementing it.
Raro (1449 D)
01 May 13 UTC
great feature! Used it already
Retillion (2304 D (B))
01 May 13 UTC
Wow ! This is fantastic ! Thank you very much, Oli :)
Philcore (968 D)
02 May 13 UTC
As a new member, but no longer a "rookie" ;-) I've got to say, I'm impressed as hell at the time it takes for a feature to be suggested and it's implementation. Nice job Oli, and thanks again for all you do here.
yaaks (1157 D)
02 May 13 UTC
Wow this is pretty cool. I can combine the new mark as unread with the new-ish notes tab to make sure i dont forget any important notes the next time I log on.
Thanks Oli!
Synapse (814 D)
02 May 13 UTC
It's broken. Only allows me to mark as unread (no longer have the option to reply.)
Synapse (814 D)
02 May 13 UTC
Never mind, forgot where the Send button was lol
Darkarus (929 D)
02 May 13 UTC
Looks great Oli thanks for all your hard work on the site
tiger (1653 D)
06 May 13 UTC
Oli, if you are busy I don't want to bother you but i would like it if the notes tab also existed in anonymous games sometime in the future. Thanks
tiger (1653 D)
06 May 13 UTC
no not anonymous games gunboat games. sorry my brain's struggling today
Captainmeme (1400 D Mod (B))
06 May 13 UTC
It does appear in gunboats...
tiger (1653 D)
06 May 13 UTC
oh yes it does my bad... today's just not my day
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
06 May 13 UTC
Quick question for improvement of this feature.

It's quite impossible to tell the difference between 'saved for later' messages and new incoming messages where you've saved the message for later, and so checking those tabs and re-marking as unread is a must if you don't wish to miss new comm.

Is it possible (not knowing how the code is structured, I'm not sure if this is easily doable or not), to have a 'opened envelope' icon for 'saved for later' and that icon switches back to the 'closed envelope' icon if a new message arrives? (If it is as simple as adding another message state in the code such as 'saved_for_later' in addition to whatever 'unread_msg' state or flag currently exists and then copying and modding the envelope icon to show an open envelope for this new state, I think it's definitely worth it. Then again, I haven't looked at the code and so have no idea if this is a difficult request or not or a change that is difficult to merge with the existing webdip code each time kestas pushes new code out).

Just a thought.
Retillion (2304 D (B))
06 May 13 UTC
Thank you Leif for pointing that out : I was thinking the same thing myself.
@Leif: but I don't quite get it - what's the practical difference between "saved for later" and "unread" ones? The notification is there so that you have to look into it anyway.
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
06 May 13 UTC
So if I saved a message from someone to work on later and before I get to it, (say in a 2 day or longer phase game or something I don't wish to address till after a retreats and a build phase which could then be 6 days later), but meanwhile that person sends me a new message, say even an hour after I saved the first one, without checking again, (and re-saving for later), I have no clue a new messages was sent.
Mapu (2086 D (B))
06 May 13 UTC
(+1)
You can always view the Messages link, which does not clear the envelopes.
Oli (977 D Mod (P))
06 May 13 UTC
(+1)
@Leif, sorry, this is not that easy to add.
The unmark-feature was an easy and quick one, but to create a new special mark for the "read later" would require some database changes and a lot of code to add in many different places all over the code. I try to avoid this, as it's hard to integrate new code from webdip back here if my code differs too much (see the missing newMessage icon in the pregame-chat.)
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
07 May 13 UTC
I was hoping otherwise, and so thought I'd toss the idea out there.. the mark for later is way more than we had before!
SandgooseXXI (1294 D)
07 May 13 UTC
(+1)
^ He means thanks, Oli! :P
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
08 May 13 UTC
goose translation roughly, but yeah..
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
08 May 13 UTC
oh, and btw goose..

Plealuhflease, dolluhflon't starluhflart talluhflockeylluhfling illuhflin goollifloose-laliflatilliflin.

Such 'translation' would be way too hard to for the rest of us to decipher.


44 replies
Geronimo (1195 D)
06 May 13 UTC
How do you know
In a game with anonymous players. Global press says a certain player has been banned for something. How do we know what country or countries he was controlling?
3 replies
Open
The Ambassador (2159 D (B))
07 May 13 UTC
Bon Jovi Moment
"Whoah, we're half way there. Whoah! Living on a prayer!"

Need just 3 more players for Youngstown WW2 game: http://www.vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=14022
4 replies
Open
Leif_Syverson (1626 D Mod)
05 May 13 UTC
Feature Disappearance
I've noticed new features usually show up with an announcement and much fanfare, but some features disappear without so much as a whimper...
8 replies
Open
Anon (?? D)
26 Apr 13 UTC
Anon World Game - Join Now!
If you are sick of people carrying over relationships in World games, this is the game for you. Nice and pure. Win with your talent: gameID=13778
12 replies
Open
Imagonnalose (992 D)
06 May 13 UTC
Game Takeover
I need a willing volunteer to take over a game for me. Its not the best situation, but not the worst.

gameID=12086 it will be as cuba.
0 replies
Open
GOD (1830 D Mod (B))
04 May 13 UTC
Sitter needed!
My parents just told me we are going to drive to Latvia for four days from this Thursday on, so I need one or several sitters for the games i can't get extended...
4 replies
Open
Schnormann (862 D)
04 May 13 UTC
Shameless advertisement for a youngstown WWII game
It´s called Total War! with a bet of 10 D.

2 days per phase, 3 more players needed.
6 replies
Open
Spanish Dip
I know there are some players her who play on the Spanish site as well. Does anyone know what is going on with the board? I haven't been able to access it since early yesterday.
10 replies
Open
SandgooseXXI (1294 D)
28 Apr 13 UTC
(+1)
How to bypass being banned on webdip
Sandgoose here just here to give you a couple quick tips and strategies in case you ever get banned on webdiplomacy. As I have not yet been caught, please accept this rather expensive method to not get caught:
63 replies
Open
Page 87 of 160
FirstPreviousNextLast
Back to top