Forum - vDiplomacy

Forum

A place to discuss topics/games with other webDiplomacy players.

Page 72 of 160

First

Previous

Next

Last

)
25 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Can't access new games

When I go to the games tag, it shows me the active games. However, if I try and go to any other part of the list (open, new, whatever) it says: (read rest of message below)

12 replies

Fortress Doerr (978

)
25 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Modern 2

http://vdiplomacy.com/board.php?gameID=8878

nice job. I got a lot of hash for being with TUrkey, but it was my best chance for survival

7 replies

Fortress Doerr (978

)
03 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Extreme Personalities

I saw a thread that talked about the game and it sounds like so much fun. Is anyone interested in playing one?

68 replies

Mod

(B)

)
23 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Chaos Question

I have a question i am not entirely sure about...if i have eg a fleet in aeg and a army in smy, would i be able to move that army with the one convoy to Rome?

2 replies

Mod

)
23 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Alas Texas must allow an auslander on the list

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/8411727/old-dominion-monarchs-taylor-heinicke-throws-division-record-730-yards

2 replies

Keyser Soze (968

)
21 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Anti-communit Needed

.

1 reply

ezpickins (1714

)
21 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

What happened to Diplomat33?

Has he gone missing?

1 reply

King Atom (1186

)
25 Jun 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Random Event Diplomacy

Information to follow...

41 replies

Fortress Doerr (978

)
19 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

You guys have finally done it

everybody at webdip is jealous of your features

http://webdiplomacy.net/forum.php?threadID=919900#919900

6 replies

Mod

)
31 Aug 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Soon....

.....I will be winning forever.

22 replies

butterhead (1272

)
04 Jul 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Blind Diplomacy important notification!!!

Since the old blind diplomacy thread got knocked down... Important notice!

24 replies

Lord Ravager (988

)
12 Jul 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

About "Battle of the Sexes Variant"

Hi people, :) I've subscribed also here like I was advised:
http://forum.webdiplomacy.net/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=920
There, my nick is: Odd Creator (that fits to me better)

50 replies

)
14 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Tactical Question

See below.

3 replies

)
14 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

What happens when you order build Army and fleet to come out from the same supply center?

the answer is a fleet.
It may be the case that the system builds in line with the order box.
though i cant recall if i ordered first Fleet and then Army in the next order box

0 replies

King Atom (1186

)
21 Mar 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Honor & Prestige

Come here to see your rankings from both systems.

66 replies

Spartan22 (1883

(B)

)
11 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Issue entering orders

So I am having an issue when I attempt to enter a "Support Move" order in a game, I am able to select where to move is going to but not where the move is coming from. It ends up reading ____ support move to _____ from ...
Anyone experience this issue before?

3 replies

)
11 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

gameID=9821

30 years is not long enough! Bet is 30.

If you are interested in something more than a quick 1v1, try this one.

0 replies

(B)

)
07 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

2 curious proposals about... TIME!

Before I ask Oli if they would be feasible and how hard to do, I'd like to hear if there are any suggestions or comments about them.

10 replies

Decima Legio (1987

)
27 Aug 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

user stats

I remember this past discussion about improving the user stats page and I've found back the link:
http://www.vdiplomacy.com/forum.php?threadID=27149&page-thread=3#threadPager
is there still interest in the topic?

61 replies

Captainmeme (1400

Mod

(B)

)
09 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Concede to a draw

Details to follow.

Captainmeme (1400 )
09 Sep 12 UTC

Would it be possible to allow the Concede button to also concede to draws? For instance:
2 powers are determined to see a game end in a two-way draw. They've worked together to wipe out every other power bar one, who already knows he's going to be defeated.
Currently, that last power has two options - play on (which I can see the merit of, but in some situations an alliance is incredibly strong so there really is no hope) or sacrifice all his SCs as quickly as possible.
The concede to a draw would make the second option much faster - all the person would need to do is press 'concede' and then the other two could vote 'draw' and the draw would be two-way, with the third person having resigned.
Is this possible to implement?

RUFFHAUS 8 (2490 )
09 Sep 12 UTC

At first glance this seems like a great idea, very insightful, and helpful in some situations. However, my concern with implementing this is that we would encourage more of these situation to manifest themselves, and specifically discourage players that fight to the end, never giving up. By putting such a system in place we would very likely bypass some of the (admittedly few) miraculous comebacks which make the game truely special. One of the wisest principles of Diplomacy is to 'never say never'.

Captainmeme (1400 )
09 Sep 12 UTC

That is very true indeed.
They use a system over on PlayDiplomacy (not sure if anyone here's heard of it?) which has a default setting of people being able to Concede to Draws, but you can enable DIAS (Draws Include All Survivors) in the game-create page. How about a reversal of this - a default state of DIAS, but Concede to Draws being available if wanted? This would encourage more people to use the first, but if people wanted a shorter game, the second option is available?

Devonian (1887 )
09 Sep 12 UTC

Please no! I hate winning to a concede and I would hate conceede to draw even more.

Captainmeme (1400 )
09 Sep 12 UTC

Just wondering - why? Is it because you haven't shown your full prowess at the game? Or does it feel like it's a dishonorable victory?

fasces349 (1007 )
09 Sep 12 UTC
(+1)

The other problem with conceding to a draw is say I am france, since the start of the game I have allied with england, turket, the last player is done to 5scs, my plan is to make a last minute stab and get the win.

Suddenly turkey votes concede and england votes draw messaging me for a good game as a faithful ally.

Now, I have 2 choices, either vote draw, or refuse to vote, announcing to the world my intention of a stab.

England, now fully aware of my intentions allys with turkey against me and gets the solo.

This is my problem with a concede to a draw, it makes lasyt second stabs impossible.

Oli (977 )
09 Sep 12 UTC

I don't think this is easy to implement.
If you have 2 players voting for a draw, and one voting for conceede and one still missing he could just vote for a draw and get in the draw. The conceede is really meant for the 2players games, where it's obvious that one player will win, but t will take quite some time. For more people involved I see more harm than gain (at the moment).

Devonian (1887 )
09 Sep 12 UTC
(+1)

I dislike concedes because:
1. I dislike quitters
2. There is often a chance for a comeback.
3. I see a weakness that my opponent could exploit. I put in a lot of thought on how to address it. Then suddenly the games over

Devonian (1887 )
09 Sep 12 UTC

4. It feels like a dishonorabe victory.

goldfinger0303 (2136 )
10 Sep 12 UTC

I agree with Devonian and even moreso with Fasces. It would be awful if implemented because it does rid you of the ability to stab. Hell, I get most of my solos stabbing allies who I'm going to "Draw" with

kaner406 (2061 )
10 Sep 12 UTC

Back in the dark days of PBEM, you had the option of voting for any number of Draw scenarios. And provided everyone agreed to them that would be the outcome.

An example could be that England and France are kicking arse, and only Russia, Austria and Italy are holding on by the skin of their teeth. Someone puts the motion forward that the game should be won by E/F and if everyone left in the game agrees to this then the game is drawn E/F get the draw, and R/A/I get a survive.

I don't think that this would work though - unless there was some kind of public announcement and the instigator/voters remain anonymous.

11 replies

)
06 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Hi everybody

...and sorry

6 replies

)
06 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

VDip Tablet Functionality

It appears I can do everything here at VDip on my iPad... except enter orders. Is this because of Flash, or is this functionality still in development?

10 replies

AgentOrange (956

)
07 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

No Confirmation Email when registering

A friend of mine is trying to register for the site, but he's not receiving the confirmation email required to activate his account. Since he can't register, he also can't post on the forums so I'm posting for him. Is there something wrong with the server or some other step we're missing in the confirmation process?

4 replies

Mod

(B)

)
03 Sep 12 UTC
(+1)

Thread is too old to reply to

ARRRHHHGGGHHHF*CK

.

23 replies

)
04 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

How to give away games. Help!

I have a game I would like to give to a friend. How do I do this? I see there's an option in the settings, but it doesn't do anything

7 replies

achillies27 (1068

)
27 Aug 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Low bet Haven match!

I'm looking to start a high quality haven game, preferably around 20 bet, as I don't have as many points here then on webdip... Also, Ppsc anon

139 replies

Fortress Doerr (978

)
05 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

WWII (Team Game) EOG

http://vdiplomacy.net/board.php?gameID=8304

good game all!

0 replies

)
31 Aug 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

google chrome

Someone can help me? I just installed google chrome, and I see it has some adventages over firefox, but when I open world variant game, the map appears big (just a portion of it) and when I slide the mouse over it, it doens't turn to the magnifying cursor anymore, so I can't zoom out the map. Thanks in advance.

10 replies

Cunnilingus (1603

)
04 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

Karibik

need 1 more player!

2 replies

Decima Legio (1987

)
01 Sep 12 UTC

Thread is too old to reply to

EoG: gameID=9531, Sack of Rome gunboat

Another solitary walk to the solo. My congrats to Orpheus.

5 replies

Page 72 of 160

First

Previous

Next

Last